Newspaper Publishers – Disallow:/

Google’s Love For Newspapers & How Little They Appreciate It

Let me help you with that, Rupert. I’m going to save you all those potential legal fees plus needing to even speak further about the evil of the Big G with two simple lines. Get your tech person to change your robots.txt file to say this:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /

Done. Do that, you’re outta Google. All your pages will be removed, and you needn’t worry about Google listing the Wall St. Journal at all.

For more on this:

User-agent: *
The asterisk (*) or wildcard represents a special value and means any robot.

Disallow:
The Disallow: line without a / (forward slash) tells the robots that they can index the entire site. Continue reading

“People are used to reading everything on the net for free, and that’s going to have to change,” Rupert Murdoch

News Corp. Investing In Larger Mobile Device

Murdoch also predicted that the New York Times Co. (NYT) will have to charge online for access to its flagship newspaper.

“The inventory of display advertising on the web is doubling every year,” said Murdoch. “They’re never going to make money on an advertising model to replace what they’re losing.”

This is a paid article available only to subscribers, ironically, if you access this article through google news, you don’t have to sign in to access it.  I’m sure that will change too though.

I’m not sure why newspaper publishers are attempting to create their own eReaders though.  Can you imagine having a Hearst reader for their titles, a newscorp reader for their titles, a cell phone, and Ipod and a laptop to carry around?  Crazyness.

RELATED:

The fundamental problem of newspapers on the internet – The Krugman Paradox

News Media Innovation, Convergence and Sustainability – Interview with Don Carli

Murdoch says papers should charge on Web

Podcast – Video Game Revenue Models To Save The New York Times?

Charlie Rose – The Future of Newspapers Panel Discussion

Description:

A conversation about the future of newspapers with Walter Isaacson former Editor of “Time Magazine”, Robert Thomson managing editor of “Wall Street Journal” and Mort Zuckerman owner and publisher of “The New York Daily News”.

Charlie “How bad is it?”
Walter “pretty bad”

At 9:20 Robert Thomson says, “Google devalues everything it touches” and I cannot help but think that he sounds like a local store owner complaining about WalMart. In the mean time everyone is shopping there and the company is single handedly responsible for most all innovation in store / product logistics. Rickles and Bamburgers went out of business for a reason, the free market spoke.

I can’t believe Mort Zuckerman didn’t mention at any point that his newspaper’s location in the commuting mecca of NY, NJ, CT is a competitive advantage that other newspapers around the nation do not enjoy. He seems blissfully aloof from the challenges of the new internet paradigm.

24:00 The panel seems to think applications and content will save their industry by creating value they can charge for. But they still haven’t told me what “need” they are filling. The value comes from filling unmet needs.

I would like Charlie Rose to ask at the next panel discussion the following questions:
1 – What unmet need is your newspaper now filling in the internet paradigm.

2 – What value can you expect to derive from filling that need?

3 – Is that value enough to make your business economically sustainable?

Murdoch Investors Are Groaning… For No Reason

The recent BreakingViews.com article: Murdoch Investors Are Groaning suggested that Rupert Murdoch overpaid when News Corp. (NWS) acquired Dow Jones for $5.6 billion.  Here’s what they said:

“Still, to be charitable, assume Dow Jones is worth half the $3 billion it traded at before Mr. Murdoch made his offer. On that basis, News Corporation shareholders forfeited $3.5 billion of value to the Bancrofts and their fellow shareholders.”

Continue reading

Interview with Alan Murray: New WSJ.com marks the beginning of a period of rapid innovation


Telephone interview with Alan Murray, Deputy managing editor and executive editor, online for The Wall Street Journal. This is transcribed from a telephone interview between Alan and I, so don’t kill me if I flubbed a word. Some answers are paraphrased.

First, thank you for taking the time to speak with me. I will disclose to you and my readers that I am a print and online subscriber to The Wall Street Journal and some years ago I worked there as a press operator in South Brunswick New Jersey.

META: Alan, after my review of the new website for WSJ.com I was left wanting a little more information regarding the specifics of the new website. Metaprinter’s readers also are interested in some site specifics so I hope this phone interview answers those questions.

META: How long has it been since the site was redesigned?

ALAN: The site was built in 1996 with the intention of being a news service for our paid print-newspaper subscribers. The site underwent a slight redesign in 2002 but until yesterday remained relatively unchanged throughout that time.

META: What prompted you to launch a new site?

ALAN: As I just mentioned, the site was not meant to do what it was trying to do as of late. The new site was designed and implemented to be a news website for subscribers, the general public, (and, Metaprinter assumes, advertisers). In the last one and a half years alone our website traffic has more than doubled. We wanted to better serve that audience.

META: Who did the site design and development? Was it in-house?

ALAN: Early on our in house team worked with Avenue A/ Razorfish for design and other things. Later we worked with Sapient to build and launch the site. Our in house team was involved throughout the entire process.

META: What was the biggest technical departure from the old site?

I didn’t ask this question but id say it’s the emphasis on community and interaction with their readers. The old site didn’t have many opportunities for dialogue.

META: WSJ is in a unique position where many of its paid subscribers come from Wall Street financial institutions. As those institutions collapse and cut back, do you see it impacting your paid subscriber revenue model?

ALAN: Large financial institutions represent a very small portion of our million plus subscribers. Most of our subscribers are small to medium size business owners, CEO’s, CFO’s and individuals interested in business finance.

META: As the only large newspaper with a paid online subscriber model, do you have any plans to go to an advertising based model?

ALAN: many of our offerings are already free to the public and advertiser supported. Sections like politics, and features like our videos and blogs. In the next few months we plan to open up our new community feature to non-subscribers however they will be required to login with their real names.

META: Linked in has a similar model no?

ALAN: Having a community with people interacting is nothing new. We want to test the notion that our unique subscriber base will build a community for intelligent, high-profile discourse.

META: Thank you, any final comments?

ALAN: Our new site is not the end of the line. It is a launch pad for new applications and innovation. It marks the beginning of a period of rapid innovation for WSJ.com. Stay tuned for lots of new developments and thanks for taking notice.

META: Thank you Alan.

End of Interview….

Well readers, Mr. Alan had to catch a plane, but that quick phone interview certainly shed some light on the thinking and planning that goes on when launching a site. Again, this is not a redesign. This is new programming, new applications, a new way of approaching the interaction of between man and machine and the evolving technology behind it.

Change is good
Change is bad
What is the only thing that stays the same?
Change is

Online is the future but does not account for enough of the revenue stream yet to be self sustaining.  What did I learn from this interview?  Hire kick ass developers, journalists, and editors to differentiate your news site from everyone else.  Offer a real value addition to people’s lives.  Even better?  Do one thing and do it so well that it becomes your brand.  News agencies that don’t do this will be swallowed up by other successful site and papers, speeding up the print to online transition.

New WSJ.com site, NOT a redesign!

Given that technology and taste changes so fast, it is a wonder that websites change so little over time. I would say that after 2 years a site should be seriously courting developers for a new product and after 3 years without change readers are starting to wonder if you really care about them. If your site is 4 years old without extensive modifications, you are probably losing customers because the customer experience is so horrible.

I am happy to report that the new WSJ.com site is not a redesign, but a completely new experience.

As you can see from the before and after photos below, the new WSJ.com site is wider, minus a side bar, and less cluttered. My initial reaction is that I like it.

OLD wsj.com site

NEW wsj.com site

I go to log in and right away encounter a problem. On my Imac I cannot log in using Firefox. I can however log in using Safari. As soon as I log in I send WSJ a note using the comment feature about the problem and within 15 minutes the problem is fixed. Maybe it was me, maybe not, either way small glitch corrected.

The WSJ.com site is the only newspaper website I know which offers real online communities.  The Journal Community is where people post profiles, make connections, share news items, and form groups around their interests.  I set up my profile, which takes about 2 minutes, and peruse the categories for newspaper groups. There are none so I start one. Here it is. Please Join.

Newspaper Industry Group wsj

Exploring the site, I get lost in a series of links and have to hit the home button a few times to get my bearings. This should resolve itself after a couple visits to the site. I read a few articles and check out the comments section, video tab, interactive graph tab, and slideshow section associated with them. They are nice new features. I should mention that at press time, only paid subscribers can comment on articles and join the community. There is also a newsreel widget that can be downloaded or embedded into any blog or social networking portal.

A redesign takes what was before, moves stuff around, puts bells and whistles on it and calls it done. What the Wall Street Journal did was completely change the way people interact with their product AND expand on the capabilities of what can be done with a multimedia website. Aside from a few kinks that will be worked out in the next few days, I think the new site is a homerun.

The Wall Street Journal debuted its WSJ magazine in this morning’s newspaper

The magazine is targeted to extremely rich people, but us poor folk like to look at the content and ads as well.  Hell, I even went to the Vertu website to find out how much a Vertu Ascent Ti. cell phone costs ($6999.99), pretty amazing. Although I’ll never buy one, perhaps my wife would like that Smythson raspberry croc print leather continental purse for Christmas?
The overall build quality of the magazine is good but not great.  The Magazine is perfect bound and suffers from a coversheet that is too thin (for the glue and ink coverage).  As you can see from the picture below the cover is wrinkled at the spine.

wrinkled cover
Another problem I found was on page 94 with ink lay-down resulting in streaking. Again, seen below.
print defect
Innovation? YES!  Why innovation? Continue reading

WSJ Saving Money By Not Giving Me A Paper?

The weekend edition of The Wall Street Journal has been removed from my student subscription.  For Shame.  Now what will I read my son?  Just because we can put a newspaper on a computer and cell phone does not mean we want to consume it that way all the time.

metaprinter reading the wall street journal to his son

From: The Wall Street Journal
Date: 2008/7/29
Subject: Important Information about your Subscription
To: [address deleted]

As a student subscriber, you have been receiving The Wall Street Journal Weekend Edition as part of your subscription. Students across the country have told us that the Monday – Friday editions of The Journal work best with their academic schedules and needs. Based on this feedback, we have adjusted your subscription to deliver only Monday through Friday, effective Saturday, August 2.

You can continue to access all of the articles and features found in the Weekend Edition through the Online Journal at WSJ.com – included in your student subscription to The Journal.

If you would like to continue to receive print copies of the Weekend Edition, please click on this link and complete the online form.

Thank you for being a valued subscriber of The Journal.

 

UPDATE 9-1-2008

One phone call is all it took to request Saturday delivery.  I’m back in the game.

If The Wall Street Journal Online Becomes Free, Why Should I Renew?

Sources state that Rupert Murdoch is strongly considering opening up the online arm of the Wall Street Journal for free to the public. The thinking is that it will increase revenue more than the subscription fees account for. I’m in a situation right now where my print subscription will expire in a few weeks. So do I let the subscription lapse and wait for my free content or do I renew and hope for refund? I’m leaning towards lapse…

Since the inception of its online website the WSJ has been a paid format. To date there are approximately 980,000 paid subscribers paying about 80 dollars each so I figure they make 80million dollars a year off paid subscribers alone. Conversely, the New York Times (who’s website is totally free after canning TimesSelect) receives approximately 400 million dollars a year from advertisers on its site NYT.com. It is a tough call giving up guaranteed money, but I know that WSJ stuck its foot in its mouth for even mentioning it. I believe they now MUST provide the content for free online. Expect it soon.

So, where does this leave me? I certainly don’t want to be the last idiot who renews his subscription moments before the service is terminated. Sure I’ll get a refund, but the emotional implications… just kidding. Seriously though, I get the student rate for a 1 year print subscription which includes unlimited online access. I commute into NYC two to three times a week and I love having the paper with me on the trip. Also, my eyes can only take so much from a back lit display, so… I’m keeping my subscription. You get my money for one more year Rupert.

Belo Spins Off Newspapers as Murdoch Consolidates

We all know by now that Rupert Murdoch plans to launch a Fox Business Channel. He will accomplish this by utilizing the content he now owns through the purchase of Dow Jones Inc.

Belo Corp. on the other hand announced on October 1st that they will be spinning off their newspaper and online news sites from their broadcast news channels. Belo claims that by separating their newspaper and TV companies that they will realize a rise in stock valuation. This is the only reason they would do such a thing. They are saying the sum of their parts is worth less than the parts themselves. Murdoch and his News Corp. see TV and newspapers as one unit however. He sees the sum of these parts as greater in value than the parts themselves.

So who is doing the right thing? One or the other? Both? Other media companies with similar holdings are now looking into their situation no doubt. An interesting bit of info on this whole thing: According to PricewaterhouseCoopers, ad revenue for newspapers is expected to shrink this year 1.5% and cable TV will increase slightly to 4.9%.

It is this author’s opinion that pure play newspaper publishing companies will continue to see their value shrink as advertisers migrate to new media and stock holders demands for profit move newspapers to lose focus.  The best thing to be right now if you are publishing a newspaper is privately owned and independently wealthy.  Investors seeking exposure to advertising money need to look at internet heavy publishing companies.  The growth rate for internet advertising is 35% over year 2005 spending to 16.9 billion dollars American.  This crushes anything else for advertising growth.